About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions



This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 39 No. 1, p. 304-313
    Received: Feb 18, 2009

    * Corresponding author(s): mdruark@wisc.edu
Request Permissions


Seasonal Losses of Dissolved Organic Carbon and Total Dissolved Solids from Rice Production Systems in Northern California

  1. Matthew D. Ruark *a,
  2. Bruce A. Linquistb,
  3. Johan Sixb,
  4. Chris van Kesselb,
  5. Chris A. Greerc,
  6. Randall G. Muttersd and
  7. James E. Hillb
  1. a Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706
    b Dep. of Plant Sciences, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616
    c Univ. of California Cooperative Extension, 142 Garden Hwy., Suite A, Yuba City, CA 95991
    d Univ. of California Cooperative Extension, 2279B Del Oro Ave., Oroville, CA 95965


Water quality concerns have arisen related to rice (Oryza sativa L.) field drain water, which has the potential to contribute large amounts of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) to the Sacramento River. Field-scale losses of DOC or TDS have yet to be quantified. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the seasonal concentrations of DOC and TDS in rice field drain water and irrigation canals, quantify seasonal fluxes and flow-weighted (FW) concentrations of DOC and TDS, and determine the main drivers of DOC and TDS fluxes. Two rice fields with different straw management practices (incorporation vs. burning) were monitored at each of four locations in the Sacramento Valley. Fluxes of DOC ranged from 3.7 to 34.6 kg ha−1 during the growing season (GS) and from 0 to 202 kg ha−1 during the winter season (WS). Straw management had a significant interaction effect with season, as the greatest DOC concentrations were observed during winter flooding of straw incorporated fields. Fluxes and concentrations of TDS were not significantly affected by either straw management or season. Total seasonal water flux accounted for 90 and 88% of the variability in DOC flux during the GS and WS, respectively. Peak DOC concentrations occurred at the onset of drainflow; therefore, changes in irrigation management may reduce peak DOC concentrations and thereby DOC losses. However, the timing of peak DOC concentrations from rice fields suggest that rice field drainage water is not the cause of peak DOC concentrations in the Sacramento River.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2010. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyAmerican Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America