About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 40 No. 3, p. 800-806
     
    Received: Apr 9, 2010
    Published: May, 2011


    * Corresponding author(s): udawattar@missouri.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0168

Agroforestry Buffers for Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions from Agricultural Watersheds

  1. Ranjith P. Udawatta *a,
  2. Harold E. Garrettb and
  3. Robert Kallenbachc
  1. a Dep. of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Natural Resources, and Center for Agroforestry, School of Natural Resources, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
    b Center for Agroforestry, School of Natural Resources, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
    c Plant Science Unit, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. Assigned to Associate Editor Vimala Nair

Abstract

Despite increased attention and demand for the adoption of agroforestry practices throughout the world, rigorous long-term scientific studies confirming environmental benefits from the use of agroforestry practices are limited. The objective was to examine nonpoint-source pollution (NPSP) reduction as influenced by agroforestry buffers in watersheds under grazing and row crop management. The grazing study consists of six watersheds in the Central Mississippi Valley wooded slopes and the row crop study site consists of three watersheds in a paired watershed design in Central Claypan areas. Runoff water samples were analyzed for sediment, total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) for the 2004 to 2008 period. Results indicate that agroforestry and grass buffers on grazed and row crop management sites significantly reduce runoff, sediment, TN, and TP losses to streams. Buffers in association with grazing and row crop management reduced runoff by 49 and 19%, respectively, during the study period as compared with respective control treatments. Average sediment loss for grazing and row crop management systems was 13.8 and 17.9 kg ha−1 yr−1, respectively. On average, grass and agroforestry buffers reduced sediment, TN, and TP losses by 32, 42, and 46% compared with the control treatments. Buffers were more effective in the grazing management practice than row crop management practice. These differences could in part be attributed to the differences in soils, management, and landscape features. Results from this study strongly indicate that agroforestry and grass buffers can be designed to improve water quality while minimizing the amount of land taken out of production.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2011. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science SocietyAmerican Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America