About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in JEQ

  1. Vol. 44 No. 5, p. 1435-1447
    unlockOPEN ACCESS
     
    Received: Mar 15, 2015
    Accepted: June 17, 2015
    Published: September 16, 2015


    * Corresponding author(s): thharter@ucdavis.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2134/jeq2015.03.0139

Fecal Indicator and Pathogenic Bacteria and Their Antibiotic Resistance in Alluvial Groundwater of an Irrigated Agricultural Region with Dairies

  1. Xunde Liab,
  2. Edward R. Atwillab,
  3. Elizabeth Antakib,
  4. Olin Applegatec,
  5. Brian Bergamaschid,
  6. Ronald F. Bondab,
  7. Jennifer Chaseab,
  8. Katherine M. Ransomc,
  9. William Samuelse,
  10. Naoko Watanabef and
  11. Thomas Harter *c
  1. a Dep. of Population Health and Reproduction
    b Western Institute for Food Safety and Security
    c Dep. of Land, Air and Water Resources, Univ. of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616
    d USGS, Sacramento, CA
    e California Dep. of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA
    f Faculty of Engineering, Division of Energy and Environmental Systems, Hokkaido Univ., Kita 13 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, 060-8628 Japan
Core Ideas:
  • Systemic surveys of groundwater microbiological quality are performed at site and regional scales.
  • Confined animal systems are chronic sources of pathogens and high enteric microbial loads.
  • Pathogen loading to groundwater is effectively mitigated by alluvial aquifer system.
  • Some microbial indicators are too ubiquitous to be useful as indicators.
  • Antibiotic resistance from CAFOs and human sources affects the alluvial aquifer system.

Abstract

Surveys of microbiological groundwater quality were conducted in a region with intensive animal agriculture in California, USA. The survey included monitoring and domestic wells in eight concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and 200 small (domestic and community supply district) supply wells across the region. Campylobacter was not detected in groundwater, whereas Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella were each detected in 2 of 190 CAFO monitoring well samples. Nonpathogenic generic E. coli and Enterococcus spp. were detected in 24.2% (46/190) and 97.4% (185/190) groundwater samples from CAFO monitoring wells and in 4.2% (1/24) and 87.5% (21/24) of CAFO domestic wells, respectively. Concentrations of both generic E. coli and Enterococcus spp. were significantly associated with well depth, season, and the type of adjacent land use in the CAFO. No pathogenic bacteria were detected in groundwater from 200 small supply wells in the extended survey. However, 4.5 to 10.3% groundwater samples were positive for generic E. coli and Enterococcus. Concentrations of generic E. coli were not significantly associated with any factors, but concentrations of Enterococcus were significantly associated with proximity to CAFOs, seasons, and concentrations of potassium in water. Among a subset of E. coli and Enterococcus isolates from both surveys, the majority of E. coli (63.6%) and Enterococcus (86.1%) isolates exhibited resistance to multiple (≥3) antibiotics. Findings confirm significant microbial and antibiotic resistance loading to CAFO groundwater. Results also demonstrate significant attenuative capacity of the unconfined alluvial aquifer system with respect to microbial transport.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2015. Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.