About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 21 No. 5, p. 554-560
     

 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1957.03615995002100050025x

Hydraulic Conductivity as Related to Certain Soil Properties in a Number of Great Soil Groups—Sampling Errors Involved1

  1. D. D. Mason,
  2. J. F. Lutz and
  3. R. G. Petersen2

Abstract

Abstract

This study was undertaken to provide information about hydraulic conductivity, percent large pores, and bulk density, their interrelationships, and the magnitude of the sampling error components involved over a wide range of soil conditions. Data from approximately 10,000 individual core samples from about 900 sites in 7 states, furnished in a cooperative project with the Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, were analyzed. Each sample was classified according to management, genetic unit (great soil group, high family, low family, and series), texture, and horizon.

Mean values for hydraulic conductivity, percent large pores and bulk density, when classified by textural groups, showed a consistent decrease in magnitude with increases in silt and clay content. Mean values for the three properties, when classified by great soil groups, showed consistent differences between groups. Correlations between hydraulic conductivity and percent large pores was positive and comparatively consistent; correlations between hydraulic conductivity and bulk density were negative and generally of a low absolute value. The indicated conclusion was that bulk density, in itself, is a poor indicator of soil permeability.

Variance components for among cores within sites and horizons, and between sites, after removal of all other classifiable variation, indicated that the between site component of the sampling error was 2 to 3 times larger than the within site component. These components are used to estimate “distinguishable permeability classes” for various sampling schemes, and by assuming various cost ratios, optimum sampling rates are estimated.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America