About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 48 No. 5, p. 1044-1050
     
    Received: June 20, 1983
    Accepted: May 7, 1984


 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800050019x

Comparison of Models for Determining Stability Constants of Metal Complexes with Humic Substances1

  1. Alanah Fitch and
  2. F. J. Stevenson2

Abstract

Abstract

Several recent approaches for determining apparent stability constants of metal complexes with humic and fulvic acids are shown to represent graphical modifications of the basic equation relating the formation function of binding (v = sites bound/macromolecule concentration) to stability constants for the system v = ΣnjKj(M)/Σ[1 + Kj (M)], where Kj is the stability constant for binding at class j, nj is the number of binding sites of class j, and (M) is the free metal ion concentration. They include the Scatchard [v/(M) vs. v], reciprocal [1/v vs. (M)], and double reciprocal [1/v vs. 1/(M)] plots. Another approach is shown to have the same form as the Hill plot, which is based on an assumption of positive cooperativity. Comparison of the various models using a common set of experimental data revealed that approaches based on an assumption of linearity yield poor estimates for stability constants. Of the various models, the Hill plot is the least reliable.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America