About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 52 No. 3, p. 618-624
     
    Received: July 20, 1987


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200030003x

Transport of a Conservative Tracer in the Field Under Continuous Flood Irrigation

  1. D. B. Jaynes ,
  2. R. C. Rice and
  3. R. S. Bowman
  1. U.S. Water Conservation Lab., 4331 E. Broadway, Phoenix, AZ 85040
    Dep. of Geoscience, New Mexico Inst. of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801

Abstract

Abstract

A 5-cm deep pulse of bromide-tagged water was applied to four small field subplots and leached under continuously flooded conditions for 7 d. During leaching, solution samples were periodically withdrawn through suction samplers from seven depths within each subplot. Pore water velocities, vs, and dispersion coefficients, D, were calculated by fitting the one-dimensional solution of the advection-dispersion equation to the concentration vs. time curves from each sampler. Both vs and D were best described by a log-normal distribution rather than a normal distribution. D values were very large compared to values reported for laboratory experiments, but similar to other field values measured under similar conditions. Neither vs nor D showed any significant correlation with depth or time, but the dispersivity (ratio of D to vs) did show a weak positive correlation with depth. The relationship between ln D and ln vs was linear with a slope near 1.0. However, when vs and D data measured in an earlier study under an intermittently dosed irrigation regime at the same site were included, ln D was no longer a simple linear function of ln vs. The ratio between the calculated pore water velocities and the velocities calculated from the surface flux divided by the average water content was equal to or slightly <1.0 for all depths >0.6 m. At depths <0.6 m the ratio was considerably >1.0, indicating that a fraction of the soil water was being bypassed or not participating in the leaching process. This result is in contrast to an earlier study conducted on this site when irrigated under a dosed irrigation scheme in which the ratio was consistently >1.0 at all depths.

Contribution of the USDA-ARS, U.S. Conservation Lab.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America