About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 52 No. 3, p. 681-688
     
    Received: Sept 3, 1987


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200030016x

Direct Measurement of Dinitrogen and Nitrous Oxide Flux in Flooded Rice Fields

  1. R. J. Buresh  and
  2. E. R. Austin
  1. IFDC/IRRI Cooperative Project, IRRI, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines
    Agro-Economic Div., IFDC, Muscle Shoals, AL 35662

Abstract

Abstract

A direct 15N method was used to measure N2 and N2O flux in flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields. The method involved application of a highly 15N-enriched source to a 0.4-m by 0.4-m microplot, collection of evolved N2 and N2O in a chamber placed over the flood-water, removal of NH3 from the air sample, conversion of some (N2 + N2O)-N in the air sample to NH+4-N, and determination of 15N content with a mass spectrometer. The flux of (N2 + N2O)-15N was measured for 17 d following urea application by three methods, each replicated four times, on a Vertic Tropaquept. In all cases, the (N2 + N2O)-15N flux was much smaller than total gaseous 15N loss as estimated from unaccounted for 15N in the 15N balance after 18 d. The (N2 + N2O)-15N flux and total 15N loss were 1.1 and 40%, respectively, following basal broadcast and incorporation of 58 kg urea-N ha−1 with 2-cm standing water; they decreased to 0.2 and 26%, respectively, when the urea basal incorporation was without standing water. The (N2 + N2O)-15N flux and total 15N loss were 0.5 and 46%, respectively, following application of 44 kg urea-N ha−1 to 50-mm floodwater at 10 d after transplanting. The methodology could detect a flux of 10 g N ha−1 d−1 from the added 59 to 64 atom % 15N-labeled urea. Additional studies with 15N-labeled NO-3 evaluated the possibility that the low (N2 + N2O)-15N flux was due to incomplete recovery of N2 and N2O formed from added fertilizer. Direct recovery of (N2 + N2O)-15N following addition of labeled NO-3 ranged from 41 to 73% of the total 15N loss. No 15N was lost by leaching or runoff, and dissolved N2O in the floodwater calculated from published solubility data was less than 1% of the added 15N.

Contribution from the Agro-Economic Div., International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), Muscle Shoals, AL 35662, and the Dep. of Agronomy, International Rice Research Inst. (IRRI), P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America