About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 52 No. 3, p. 833-839
     
    Received: June 13, 1987
    Published: May, 1988


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200030042x

Lodgepole Pine Fertilization Screening Trials: Four-year Growth Response Following Initial Predictions

  1. G. F. Weetman ,
  2. R. M. Fournier and
  3. E. Schnorbus
  1. Faculty of Forestry, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1W5

Abstract

Abstract

The use of fertilizer screening trials was examined to determine if the pattern of 4-yr basal area (BA) increment response by treatment agreed with the predictions based on first season needle weight response. Screening trials can diagnose stand nutritional status and subsequent response. Nitrogen, P and K in various combinations were applied to 17 lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm.) stands in the interior of British Columbia, Canada. Of these, 14 had been precommercially thinned. Remeasurement of 15 stands after 4 yr showed that 50 to 150 kg N ha−1 produced significant growth responses in many stands. Nitrogen applied at rates of 50, 100, and 150 kg ha−1 increased BA growth of individual trees by an average of 27, 41, and 48% over the control, respectively. Adding P at 50 kg ha−1 significantly improved BA growth in only two stands, while the effect of K was not significant. Graphical diagnoses of shifts in unit fascicle weight and foliar concentrations and contents in the first growing season following fertilization generally corresponded with subsequent 4-yr BA response in 11 of the 15 installations. Stands responsive to N fertilization were weakly responsive to thinning. Nonresponsive stands reacted to thinning, presumably because N was not limiting growth. The best fit of multiple regression analyses between basal area response and stand factors yielded an R2 of 0.57, with needle weight and foliar N and P levels as important variables.

Contribution from the Faculty of Forestry, Univ. of British Columbia.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America