About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 53 No. 1, p. 15-18
    Received: Feb 12, 1988

    * Corresponding author(s):
Request Permissions


Estimating Molecular Diffusion Coefficients of Urea in Unsaturated Soil

  1. A. M. Sadeghi,
  2. D. E. Kissel  and
  3. M. L. Cabrera
  1. Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506



A correct value for the molecular diffusion coefficient of urea in soil (Ds) is required to accurately predict urea movement in soil by molecular diffusion. In previous work, to estimate Ds in a simulation model of urea diffusion, we used an empirical equation of Papendick and Campbell that describes Ds for a dissolved species in soil to be a product of a tortuosity factor squared, the species diffusion coefficient in water (Dw), and the volumetric water content. Comparisons of measured and computed urea concentration with depth indicated that this equation was not adequately general over a wide range of soils. The objective of this study was to modify the parameters in the equation and, if necessary, develop a new relationship to estimate the value of Ds in soils. Laboratory studies were conducted on seven soils in which the clay content ranged from 10 to 51%. Urea concentrations with depth at 48 h following surface-application were measured and also computed using numerical techniques with an initial estimate for Ds instead of computing it using Papendick and Campbell's equation. The Ds was modified incrementally, until the difference between computed and measured concentrations was minimized. In all seven soils, good agreement was obtained between measured and computed urea concentrations with depth. The maximum depth of urea movement occurred in Kahola soil (approx. 3.5-cm deep), whereas least movement occurred in Crete soil (approx. 2.6-cm deep). Nonlinear regression analysis gave a better relationship (Ds = 0.18 × Dwv/porosity)2.98, R2 = 0.88) when relative water content (Θv/porosity) of the seven soils was substituted for the volumetric water content (Ds = 0.73 × Dwv)2.58, R2 = 0.66) in Papendick and Campbell's equation.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America