About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.

 

Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 56 No. 3, p. 675-682
     
    Received: Apr 30, 1990


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030002x

Infiltration Simulations among Five Hydraulic Property Models

  1. Sam Alessi ,
  2. Lyle Prunty and
  3. W.M. Schuh
  1. USDA-ARS North Central Soil Conservation Research Lab., Morris, MN 56267
    Dep. of Soil Science, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
    North Dakota State Water Commission, Bismarck, ND 58505

Abstract

Abstract

Analytical functions are used within computer models to give continuous representation of discrete data obtained from measurement. Functionally different equations have been used for soil hydraulic properties without concern for their smoothing effect on the data or their relationship to the stability of the numerical algorithm. This study evaluates the effect of five different power-function representations of the soil water-retention function and corresponding poreinteraction hydraulic-conductivity representations on numerical solutions of Richards' equation. The functions were curve-fit to 46 data sets for Hecla loamy fine sand (sandy, mixed Aquic Haploboroll). Minimum, median, and maximum function parameters (Campbell's b coefficient and air entry) were used to identify data sets from which one-dimensional finite-difference infiltration simulations were conducted. The wetting-front location varied 6.0 to 8.0 cm (T = 6 min) among models, whereas variation within a model due to soil-series-imposed parameter variability was slightly larger (5.5–8.5 cm). Infiltration amounts varied −27 to 12% from the average among models. The results quantify sources of error due to curve-fitting soil waterretention data to analytical functions assuming pore-interaction theory.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America