About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 59 No. 4, p. 975-981
     
    Received: Mar 11, 1994
    Published: July, 1995


    * Corresponding author(s): michael_vespraskas@ncsu.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040003x

Hydraulic Conductivity of Saprolite as a Function of Sample Dimensions and Measurement Technique

  1. M. J. Vepraskas  and
  2. J. P. Williams
  1. Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695

Abstract

Abstract

Accurate hydraulic conductivity (K) data are needed to evaluate soils for on-site waste disposal, but such data are difficult to obtain where K values vary with sample dimensions. This study evaluated the K of a quartz-diorite saprolite (Cl horizon) by comparing saturated hydraulic conductivities (Ksat) for sample volumes of 347, 6280, and 675000 cm3. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivities [K(h)] for sample volumes of 347 and 6280 cm3 were compared using a one-step outflow procedure and the crust test. A dye was also applied to the largest samples to determine the depth distribution of water-conducting macropores. The mean Ksat value found for samples with volumes of 347 cm3 (0.04 cm h−1) was significantly lower than the mean Ksat values found for larger samples (0.16–0.20 cm h−1); means for the latter samples were not significantly different (P = 0.10). Means for K(h) also differed between the two sample volumes for soil water pressure heads of −5 and −10 cm. Channels were the major kind of water-conducting macropore observed. The results from both the pore studies and K measurements showed that the minimum sample size needed in situ for K measurements in this horizon was ≈ 5000 cm3 for soil water pressure heads between 0 and −10 cm. Detached cores with smaller cross-sectional areas could be used for measuring K(h) at soil water pressure heads of -20 cm or less.

The research was funded by Grant no. 70121 from the Water Resources Research Inst. of the Univ. of North Carolina. The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service of the product named, nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America