About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 60 No. 1, p. 5-12
     
    Received: Jan 18, 1995
    Published: Jan, 1996


    * Corresponding author(s): clothierb@hort.cri.nz
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000010004x

Characterizing Water and Solute Movement by Time Domain Reflectometry and Disk Permeametry

  1. Iris Vogeler,
  2. Brent E. Clothier ,
  3. Steven R. Green,
  4. David R. Scotter and
  5. Russell W. Tillman
  1. Dep. of Soil Science, Massey Univ., and Hort Research Inst., Private Bag 11-030, Palmerston North, New Zealand
    Environment Group, Hort Research Inst., Private Bag 11-030, Palmerston North, New Zealand
    Dep. of Soil Science, Massey Univ., Private Bag, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Abstract

Abstract

To investigate a rapid, nondestructive way of characterizing solute transport properties, time domain reflectometry (TDR) and disk permeametry have been used in combination. Calibration measurements had previously related TDR measurements to both the volumetric water content and the pore water concentration of Cl-. Laboratory measurements from a horizontal TDR probe were used to estimate transport parameters in a soil column by applying a one-dimensional numerical model in an inverse sense. A vertical TDR probe was used to provide independent verification of these parameters. A repacked column of Ramiha silt loam (an Andic Dystrochrept) was used under unsaturated, transient flow conditions. The disk permeameter, set to a pressure head of −50 mm and containing a solution of 0.032 M KCl, was placed straight onto the repacked soil column, which had an initial water content of 0.32 m3 m-3. The soil wet to 0.60 m3 m-3. However, in the columns only an envelope of Cl- concentration could be obtained, due to exchange between the initially resident Ca2+ and the invading K+. This illustrates why cation exchange needs to be considered when TDR is used to infer solute dispersivity and the retardation were found to be 2.3 mm and 1.2, respectively. The retardation is shown to be due to the anion-exchange capacity varying with the concentration of the invading soil solution.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America