About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 61 No. 1, p. 232-239
     
    Received: Feb 20, 1995
    Published: Jan, 1997


    * Corresponding author(s): geert.sterk@users.tct.wau.nl
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010032x

Mapping Wind-Blown Mass Transport by Modeling Variability in Space and Time

  1. G. Sterk  and
  2. A. Stein
  1. Dep. of Irrigation and Soil & Water Conservation, Wageningen Agricultural University, Nieuwe Kanaal 11, 6709 PA Wageningen, the Netherlands
    Dep. of Soil Science and Geology, Wageningen Agricultural University, P.O. Box 37, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract

Field observations of wind-blown particle transport are often characterized by a considerable spatial variation, which makes quantitative modeling of wind erosion difficult. This study examines how the horizontal distribution, or pattern, of mass transport can be determined from a limited number of point measurements. Twenty-one sediment catchers were installed in an experimental plot in the Sahelian zone of Niger, on a sandy, siliceous, isohyperthermic Psammentic Paleustalf. Mass transport values during four storms ranged from 24.0 to 213.6 kg m−1, 7.2 to 26.0 kg m−1, 9.6 to 68.9 kg m−1, and 68.9 to 282.7 kg m−1. Geostatistical theory was applied to produce storm based maps by modeling the spatial correlation structure with the variogram. To estimate the variogram from 21 observations, the four storms were treated as independent temporal replicates. Two geostatistical mapping techniques were applied. Kriging (a spatial interpolation technique) produced maps of mass transport providing the best possible estimates of net soil losses from the plot, equal to 12.5, 2.0, 4.6, and 26.8 Mg ha−1, respectively. To overcome smoothing, possible realizations of actual mass transport were created by stochastic simulations with simulated annealing. The simulated maps reproduced the statistical properties of the observations and allowed a distinction between erosion and deposition areas within the experimental plot.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America