About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 61 No. 4, p. 1037-1041
     
    Received: Mar 20, 1996


    * Corresponding author(s): k-mcinnes@tamu.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040007x

Spatial Variability of Water Fluxes in Soil: A Field Study

  1. W. J. Heuvelman and
  2. K. J. McInnes 
  1. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2474

Abstract

Abstract

Knowledge of spatial variability of soil properties is important for soil sampling and modeling water and solute transport through soil. A field study was conducted on a Silawa-variant loamy fine sand (fine, mixed, thermic Udic Paleustalf) in Brazos County, Texas, to evaluate spatial variability and convergence and divergence of water fluxes through the soil profile. A 7 by 14 grid of interception cells (each 25 by 25 mm) was built to collect surface-applied water at 0.3-, 0.9-, and 1.2-m depth. The interception cells were installed on the ceilings of tunnels that had been hand dug horizontally into the walls of a large backhoe-dug pit. Water was applied under a positive head of ≈50 mm in a 1.2 by 1.2 m infiltration square. Normal and lognormal probability functions were fitted to frequency distributions of intercepted fluxes from topsoil and subsoil, respectively, with correlation coefficients of 0.95 and higher. Most nonmatrix flow was found at 0.9 m in the Bt2 horizon. We speculate that fluxes were most heterogeneous in this horizon because of associated soil texture and structure. Compared with soil at 0.3 and 1.2 m, texture was finer, peds were larger, and clay films were more abundant at 0.9 m. This relationship with pedologic development suggests that descriptions of texture and structure might be used to predict spatial distributions of fluxes and design sampling schemes. Convergence of water flowpaths was observed from 0.3 to 0.9 m while divergence occurred from 0.9 to 1.2 m.

Research conducted by the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., the Texas A&M Univ. System. Support for this research was from USGS Grants 14-08-001-G1592 and 14-08-001-G2048 through the Texas Water Resources Institute and from USDA-CSRS Grants 93-37102-9019 and 93-34214-8902.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America