About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 62 No. 4, p. 992-999
     
    Received: Nov 25, 1996


    * Corresponding author(s): taob@icon.imok.ufl.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040021x

Water and Nitrogen Management of Sugarcane Grown on Sandy, High-Water-Table Soil

  1. T. A. Obreza ,
  2. D. J. Pitts and
  3. D. L. Anderson
  1. Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2686 State Road 29 North, Immokalee, FL 34142-9515
    Everglades Research and Education Center, P.O. Box 8003, Belle Glade, FL 33430-8003

Abstract

Abstract

Little information exists regarding water and N fertilizer management for sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) production on Florida's high-water-table sandy soils. We hypothesized that sugar yield and N-use efficiency would be affected by water table depth and N fertilizer application timing. Sugarcane (cv. CP 72-1210) was grown in >1-ha plots for three seasons on Basinger sand (siliceous, hyperthermic Spodic Psammaquent) to determine the effects of water table depth (0.46 vs. 0.57 m), N fertilization frequency (13 vs. 7 split applications for 3 yr, at 224 kg N ha-1 yr-1), and Mg fertilizer rate (0 vs. 60 kg Mg ha-1 yr-1) on cane and sugar yields. Annual mean high- and low-water-table differences were 0.13, 0.11, and 0.10 m, resulting in a 0.2 to 1.4 J kg-1 difference in soil water matric potential at middle of the root zone, and a 0.02 to 0.11 m3 m-3 difference in soil water concentration in the top 0.30 m. Three-year mean yields for low vs. high water table were 73.7 vs. 67.9 t sugarcane ha-1 and 9.23 vs. 8.51 t sugar ha-1. High vs. low N fertilization frequency yielded 75.0 vs. 66.5 t sugarcane ha-1 and 9.41 vs. 8.33 t sugar ha-1. There were no water level × N fertilization frequency interactions. Where mean Mehlich 1 extractable Mg was 25 mg kg-1, Mg fertilization did not affect yield, suggesting that this Mg level should be classified in the unresponsive (“high”) range. Although increasing N fertilization frequency increases the fertilization program cost, its use is justified by increased sugar yield.

Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series no. R-05447.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America