About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 62 No. 4, p. 1103-1108
     
    Received: June 16, 1997
    Published: July, 1998


    * Corresponding author(s):
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040035x

Nitrogen Movement with Furrow Irrigation Method and Fertilizer Band Placement

  1. J. G. Benjamin ,
  2. L. K. Porter,
  3. H. R. Duke,
  4. L. R. Ahuja and
  5. G. Butters
  1. USDA-ARS, Central Great Plains Research Unit, P.O. Box 400, Akron, CO 80720
    USDA-ARS, Soil-Plant-Nutrient Research Unit, Ft. Collins, CO 80522
    USDA-ARS, Water Management Research Unit, Ft. Collins, CO 80523
    USDA-ARS, Great Plains Systems Research Unit, Ft. Collins, CO 80522
    Dep. of Soil and Crop Science, Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523

Abstract

Abstract

Alternate-furrow irrigation has been proposed as a method to increase irrigation water use efficiency, increase capture and storage of rainfall during the irrigation season, and decrease deep percolation of water. We hypothesized that less fertilizer leaching would occur if the applied fertilizer were spatially separated from the irrigation water in a furrow irrigation system. A study was conducted on a Fort Collins loam (fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Aridic Haplustalf) in 1994 and 1995 near Fort Collins, CO. Nitrogen uptake by corn (Zea mays L.) and N leaching were determined with alternate-furrow and every-furrow irrigation water applications, each with fertilizer bands of 15N-enriched (NH4)2SO4 placed either in the row or in the furrow. In 1994 fertilizer N leached to ≈1 m for the every-furrow irrigation with fertilizer placed in the irrigated furrow, but to 0.5 m or less for the other treatments. In 1995 the fertilizer leaching was similar among the treatments because of less irrigation and more rainfall during the growing season. There were no statistically significant differences for irrigation water placement effects on plant biomass or total N uptake, indicating that alternate-furrow irrigation is not detrimental to crop production compared with every-furrow irrigation for similar applications of water. This study showed that placing fertilizer in the nonirrigated furrow of an alternate-furrow irrigation system or placing fertilizer in the row with either alternate- or every-furrow irrigation has the potential to decrease fertilizer leaching without reducing crop productivity.

Supported in part by NRI Competitive Grants Program/USDA Grant no. 94-37102-1146.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © . Soil Science Society of America