About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 65 No. 2, p. 460-462
     
    Received: Apr 6, 2000


    * Corresponding author(s): ypachep@hydrolab.arsusda.gov
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.652460x

Comparison of soil water retention at field and laboratory scales

  1. Yakov Pachepsky *a,
  2. Walter J. Rawlsb and
  3. Daniel Giménezc
  1. a Bldg. 007 Rm. 104, BARC-WEST, Beltsville, MD 20705
    b USDA-ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab., Beltsville, MD 20705
    c Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State Univ. of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901

Abstract

Water content and soil water matric potential are measured in different soil volumes and at different spatial scales in the laboratory and in the field. The objective of this work was to use a large database to compare field and laboratory water retention. The database consisted of 135 datasets for soil horizons of various textures. Coarse-textured soils had the average difference between field and laboratory water contents close to zero. On the contrary, fine-textured soils with the sand content <50% had field water contents substantially smaller than the laboratory water contents in the range of water contents from 0.45 to 0.60 cm3 cm−3 A quadratic regression explained 70% of variability in field water contents as computed from the laboratory data. A fractal scaling of the bulk density could contribute to the observed field–lab differences in volumetric water contents for the range of high water contents.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2001. Soil Science SocietyPublished in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.65:460–462.