About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 65 No. 2, p. 557-577
     
    Received: Aug 13, 1999


    * Corresponding author(s): cjohnsto@d.umn.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.652557x

Nutrient Dynamics in Relation to Geomorphology of Riverine Wetlands

  1. Carol A. Johnston *a,
  2. Scott D. Bridghamb and
  3. Joseph P. Schubauer-Beriganc
  1. a Natural Resources Research Institute, Univ. of Minnesota, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811
    b Dep. of Biological Sciences, Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556
    c National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268

Abstract

Variation in water depth and soil properties associated with geomorphic structures can affect riverine wetland nutrient dynamics by altering biogeochemical processes. We examined the seasonal influence of soils and geomorphology on nutrient forms and concentrations in riverine wetlands in northeastern Minnesota (silty soils) and northwestern Wisconsin (clayey soils). Soil, water, and plant biogeochemistry were contrasted between and within the wetlands according to geomorphic features (riverbed, levee, and backwater zones). There were few inter-wetland differences, and most were the result of differences in river water chemistry and levee elevation between the two sites. Levees were hot spots of NO3–N, with spring porewater NO3–N concentrations (340 μg L−1 at Fond du Lac, 44 μg L−1 at Pokegama) that were orders of magnitude higher than elsewhere in the wetlands. Summer denitrification potential was high in the levees (≈6 nmol N2O g−1 h−1) and in organic backwater zones (8.3 nmol N2O g−1 h−1 at Fond du Lac, 4.8 nmol N2O g−1 h−1 at Pokegama), but denitrification was consistently NO 3-limited throughout both wetlands. Riverbeds were zones of highest P concentration in soil, vegetation, and summer surface water. Sedimentation rates were higher in riverbeds (289 g m−2 d−1 at Fond du Lac, 54 g m−2 d−1 at Pokegama) than in backwaters (80 g m−2 d−1 at Fond du Lac, 17 g m−2 d−1 at Pokegama). The two backwater zones had comparably low summer surface water concentrations of NO3–N (≈4 μg L−1), NH4–N (≈6 μg L−1), total P (TP) (≈80 μg L−1), total suspended solids (TSS) (≈6 mg L−1), and volatile suspended solids (VSS) (≈4 mg L−1). This seasonal convergence of surface water chemistry implies that biotic processes common to the two backwater areas override their substrate differences. Backwaters were hydrologically connected to the river mainstem via openings in discontinuous natural levees, but the different water chemistry of riverbed vs. backwater zones indicated minimal water exchange between them. This hydrologic zonation of riverine wetlands by geomorphic structures was the major source of intra-wetland variability.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2001. Soil Science SocietyPublished in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.65:557–577.