About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 65 No. 6, p. 1593-1598
     
    Received: Jan 31, 2001
    Published: Nov, 2001


    * Corresponding author(s): zorita@inta.gov.ar
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.1593

Laboratory Compaction of Soils using a Small Mold Procedure

  1. M. Díaz-Zorita *a,
  2. J. H. Groveb and
  3. E. Perfectc
  1. a EEA INTA General Villegas, CC 153 (B6230 ZBA), General Villegas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    b Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
    c Dep. of Geological Sciences, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1410

Abstract

The compactability of a soil can be determined from parameters derived from laboratory compaction curves generated using the Proctor test. However, this is a destructive, time-consuming, and labor-expensive procedure. Our objective was to evaluate a new more rapid test to determine the maximum dry bulk density (ρMax b) and soil water content at ρMax b (SWCMax) from laboratory compaction curves using a mold with smaller dimensions than established for the standard procedure. Laboratory compaction curves were developed for nine soils with clay contents ranging from 232 to 385 g kg−1 using the standard Proctor test procedure and the proposed procedure, which uses a 54-mm diam. mold and a 24.4 N rammer dropped from a height of 305 mm to produce a compactive effort (CE) of 109 kJ m−3 drop−1 At a CE of 545 kJ m−3, which is similar to the 540 kJ m−3 produced by the standard test, the ρMax b and SWCMax parameters derived from the proposed procedure were positively and significantly correlated with those derived from the standard Proctor test. With both procedures, ρMax b decreased and SWCMax increased as the soil clay content increased. The small mold method did not affect the linear relationship between soil clay content and ρMax b However, different relationships between SWCMax and clay content were observed, depending on the compaction procedure. Use of the small mold procedure requires less dry sieved soil, saves time, and labor in evaluating soil compactability. Based only on the reduction in rammer drops, use of the small mold procedure involves 15 times less labor requirements than the standard Proctor test.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2001. Soil Science SocietyPublished in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.65:1593–1598.