About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.

 

Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 66 No. 2, p. 519-523
     

    * Corresponding author(s): tcbalser@facstaff.wisc.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.5190

Methodological variability in microbial community level physiological profiles

  1. Teri C. Balser *a,
  2. James W. Kirchnerb and
  3. Mary K. Firestonec
  1. a Dep. of Soil Science, 1525 Observatory Dr., Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
    b Dep. of Earth and Planetary Science, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
    c Dep. of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

Abstract

We performed two experiments to assess the methodological variability of microbial community-level physiological profiles (CLPP, using the BiOLOG assay) in soil from a California annual grassland ecosystem. In a study to assess the impact of sample preparation, we found that bacteria adhered to soil surfaces are numerically dominant and have CLPPs indistinguishable from that of intact soil. Studies that allow soil particles to settle prior to dilution or plating may not accurately reflect the substrate utilization pattern of whole soil. In a hierarchical ANOVA, we found that nearly all of the methodological variability in the CLPP assay comes from soil replicates rather than plate replicates. Many laboratories replicate at the level of the CLPP plate. Our results indicate that to best represent a given soil sample, it is important to replicate soil subsamples, rather than CLPP plates.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2002. Soil Science SocietyPublished in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.66:519–523.