About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 67 No. 2, p. 518-526
     
    Received: Jan 25, 2002


    * Corresponding author(s): LDUD@MENDEL.USU.EDU
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2003.5180

Low Frequency Impedance Behavior of Montmorillonite Suspensions

  1. Lynn M. Dudley *a,
  2. Stephen Bialkowskic,
  3. Dani Orb and
  4. Chad Junkermeierd
  1. a Dep. of Plants, Soils and Biometeorology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322
    c Chemistry and Biochemistry Dep., Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322
    b Northeast Foundation Utilities Professor, Dep. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Road, Unit 2037, Storrs, CT 06269-2037
    d Physics Dep., Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322

Abstract

Large changes in permittivity have been observed as the frequency of an electromagnetic (EM) field applied to systems containing phases of contrasting permittivity is changed. Two mechanisms, polarization of a diffuse double layer (DDL) and polarization of the charge imbalance created by contact of two phases of different permittivity (the Maxwell-Wagner [MW] effect), are responsible for the frequency dependence of dielectric properties. To use the frequency dependence of dielectric properties to determine soil geometrical and electrochemical properties, the two mechanisms must be quantified. Three models of the frequency dependent dielectric properties, based on terms representing polarization of the electrical double layer that develops at the electrode surface, polarization of the DDL and the MW effect, were used to investigate the dielectric spectrum of montmorillonite suspensions. Dielectric spectra of suspensions of three particle-size separates (r > 1.0 μm, 1.0 μm > r > 0.2 μm, 0.2 μm > r) of homoionic (Na+ or Ca2+) were measured at a suspension density of 5.0 g of clay in 50 mL of water. Impedance plane plots suggested the contribution of three relaxation processes to the spectra. While all three models reproduced the data, they gave different interpretations of the data. Two models attributed relaxation in the kHz range to electrode polarization, relaxation at approximately 10 kHz to DDL polarization and relaxation at 1 MHz to MW polarization. The third model assigned MW polarization to the relaxation at 10 kHz and DDL polarization to the relaxation at 1 MHz.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2003. Soil Science SocietyPublished in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.67:518–526.