About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 73 No. 4, p. 1202-1208
     
    Received: Feb 12, 2008
    Published: July, 2009


    * Corresponding author(s): wchf1680@sina.com
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2008.0045

Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Content Using Cokriging with Remotely Sensed Data

  1. Chunfa Wu *abc,
  2. Jiaping Wua,
  3. Yongming Luoc,
  4. Limin Zhangd and
  5. Stephen D. DeGloriae
  1. a formerly with:, Dep. Natural Resources and Environ., Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310029, China
    b currently at, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research for, Sustainable Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, 264003, China
    c Key Lab. of Soil Environment and Pollution, Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
    d Haining Agricultural Extension Service, Haining 314400, China
    e Dep. Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853

Abstract

Accurately measuring soil organic matter content (SOM) in paddy fields is important because SOM is one of the key soil properties controlling nutrient budgets in agricultural production systems. Estimation of this soil property at an acceptable level of accuracy is important; especially in the case when SOM exhibits strong spatial dependence and its measurement is a time- and labor-consuming procedure. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare spatial estimation by kriging and cokriging with remotely sensed data to predict SOM using limited available data for a 367-km2 study area in Haining City, Zhejiang Province, China. Measured SOM ranged from 5.7 to 40.4 g kg−1, with a mean of 19.5 g kg−1 Correlation analysis between the SOM content of 131 soil samples and the corresponding digital number (DN) of six bands (Band 1–5 and Band 7) of Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) imagery showed that correlation between SOM and DN of Band 1 was the highest (r = −0.587). We used the DN of Band 1 as auxiliary data for the SOM prediction, and used descriptive statistics and the kriging standard deviation (STD) to compare the reliabilities of the predictions. We also used cross-validation to validate the SOM prediction. Results indicate that cokriging with remotely sensed data was superior to kriging in the case of limited available data and the moderately strong linear relationship between remotely sensed data and SOM content. Remotely sensed data such as Landsat ETM imagery have the potential as useful auxiliary variables for improving the precision and reliability of SOM prediction.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2009. Soil Science SocietySoil Science Society of America