About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions
 

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.

 

Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.

Abstract

 

This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 73 No. 6, p. 2184-2190
     
    Received: Sept 25, 2008


    * Corresponding author(s): rnorman@uark.edu
 View
 Download
 Alerts
 Permissions
Request Permissions
 Share

doi:10.2136/sssaj2008.0309

Nitrogen Fertilizer Sources and Timing before Flooding Dry-Seeded, Delayed-Flood Rice

  1. R. J. Norman *a,
  2. C. E. Wilsonb,
  3. N. A. Slatonc,
  4. B. R. Griggsa,
  5. J. T. Bushongd and
  6. E. E. Gbure
  1. a Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 115 Plant Science Building, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
    b Rice Research and Extension Center, 2900 Hwy. 130 East, Stuttgart, AR 72160
    c Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 W. Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704
    d USDA-NRCS, 4900 Oklahoma Ave., Ste. 300, Woodward, OK 73801
    e Agricultural Statistics Lab., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

Abstract

Urea is the primary N source used for the large preflood N application in delayed-flood rice (Oryza sativa L.) production in the southern United States. Urea is prone to substantial NH3 volatilization losses, however, if fields are not flooded quickly. Most delayed-flood rice fields require 5 to 10 d to flood. Consequently, a study was conducted to evaluate the use of less NH3–volatile N sources for the preflood N application. The objectives were to evaluate the NH3 volatilization loss and impact on N uptake and rice yield when urea, urea plus the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), (NH4)2SO4, or a urea-(NH4)2SO4 (UAS) blend were applied preflood and a flood established 1, 5, or 10 d after N application. When flooding was delayed for 5 or 10 d after N application, NH3 volatilization was the least for urea + NBPT (2–10%) and (NH4)2SO4 (4–5%) and they produced the highest rice N uptake and yield. The UAS blend that had NH3 volatilization losses (11–15%) at 5 and 10 d after application that were intermediate between urea (17–24%) and (NH4)2SO4 or urea + NBPT also had N uptake and grain yield intermediate between these N sources. Urea should only be used if ∼2 d are required to flood a field. If 3 to 5 d are required to flood a field, then UAS has some merits but it is not as consistent as (NH4)2SO4 or urea + NBPT. When >5 d are required to flood, (NH4)2SO4 or urea + NBPT should be used.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2009. Soil Science SocietySoil Science Society of America