About Us | Help Videos | Contact Us | Subscriptions

Members of ASA, CSSA, and SSSA: Due to system upgrades, your subscriptions in the digital library will be unavailable from May 15th to May 22nd. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and thank you for your patience. If you have any questions, please call our membership department at 608-273-8080.


Institutional Subscribers: Institutional subscription access will not be interrupted for existing subscribers who have access via IP authentication, though new subscriptions or changes will not be available during the upgrade period. For questions, please email us at: queries@dl.sciencesocieties.org or call Danielle Lynch: 608-268-4976.



This article in SSSAJ

  1. Vol. 76 No. 6, p. 2136-2142
    Received: May 23, 2012
    Published: October 5, 2012

    * Corresponding author(s): ieyasu4337@yahoo.co.jp
Request Permissions


Calibration and Use of Neutron Moisture and Gamma Density Probes in Rocky Soils

  1. Ieyasu Tokumoto *,
  2. James L. Heilman,
  3. Kevin J. McInnes,
  4. Cristine L.S. Morgan and
  5. Ray H. Kamps
  1. Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843


In situ measurement of water content in rocky soils is difficult because rocks hinder insertion of probes and alter physical properties of the soil used to detect water content. We investigated the impact of rock on neutron probe measurements of volumetric water content (θ), and on γ densitometry measurements of wet bulk density (ρwet). Measurements were done in a drum packed with a clay loam having a range of θ and rock density. The annular space between access tube and hole was sealed with expandable polyurethane foam to replicate a field installation in a karst savanna. The relationship between neutron probe count ratios (CRn) and θ, obtained with different fractions of rock, was nonlinear, and nearly identical to that obtained with soil only, indicating that a single calibration curve could be used, regardless of the amount of rock in the soil profile. The nonlinearity was caused by the foam-filled void between tube and hole, which affected measurement geometry. Gamma count ratios (CRd) decreased with increasing wet bulk density, as predicted by theory. However, the foam sealant resulted in higher CRd than predicted by theory because it reduced absorption and increased scattering of γ particles. A utility of using both methods is that dry bulk density can be estimated by subtracting the density of water in the soil volume from ρwet, allowing locations of the soil profile to be identified where high rock density may restrict water flow and root water uptake.

  Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left.

Copyright © 2012. Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc.